SPARKS Forum Index SPARKS
Discussions about the band SPARKS
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

BBC BANS DICK AROUND
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SPARKS Forum Index -> Official Announcements
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
flamingkitties
Groupie


Joined: 24 Mar 2003
Posts: 169
Location: Wiltshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

loz wrote:
I suggest we all keep up the hissy fits. They may have decided it's not banned, but I don't seem to hear them playing it.....


They don't play lots of things, it's nothing to do with banning, it's all to do with money (and the rigging of the pop charts, folks.)
_________________
I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
rainbow
Power Groupie


Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 372
Location: holland

PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it was true, of course it's ridiculous. But, now, it works very well for the publicity! It will now be booming, won't it?
Darn, they f****ing (ooops!) deserve a number one on every playlist,
AND to be number one of every chart!!
_________________
Stop, there's gotta be a million girls like her, though
I can't think of one
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rmmorrow
Groupie


Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:06 pm    Post subject: Pitchfork Coverage of Ban Reply with quote

http://pitchforkmedia.com/page/news/38820/BBC_Dicks_Over_Sparks#38820
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kermit
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That settles that then I guess. Thanks for that link rmmmorrow Controversy can sometimes be a good thing of course. It all keeps the hot kettle bubbling which after all is what we all want.
Controversy?....now that was an old Prince track? Confusion?......like what we've just had in a way, that was a rather excellent Sparks track, I wonder what old Jacques Tati would have made of all that? ......Maybe even a good track to be playing in the second set in Brighton if Ron & Russ are hearing this.
Back to top
TabbyCat
Newbie


Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 5
Location: Devon

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks BBC - done the lads a favour methinks - now everyone will be talking about it!
_________________
Why the hell did you desert me when I said that you were essential?
Why the hell did you desert me when I was so influential?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
DK
Certified Fan


Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 64
Location: Denmark

PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One more magazine has this story.....

http://www.side-line.com/index_uk.php
_________________
Finish up your beer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DublinWriter
Newbie


Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would remind those here present that being banned by the BBC usually results in having a #1 or #2 single. I would cite the precidents of The Sex Pistols ('Anarchy in the UK') and Frankie Goes to Hollywood ('Relax'), m'lud.,

Personally, I find my fragile young mind has been abused. Why didn't they call the song "Richard Around"? Won't anybody think of the children?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fossilise_apostle
Sub-Deity


Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1418
Location: England

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It wasn't actually banned, and plenty of songs that have been banned haven't reached number one or two, mmmkay?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
straightlookingenie
Groupie


Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 128
Location: Pluto

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 2:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DublinWriter wrote:
I would remind those here present that being banned by the BBC usually results in having a #1 or #2 single. I would cite the precidents of The Sex Pistols ('Anarchy in the UK') and Frankie Goes to Hollywood ('Relax'), m'lud.,

Personally, I find my fragile young mind has been abused. Why didn't they call the song "Richard Around"? Won't anybody think of the children?


HAHAHA, a real LOL moment, thank you!
_________________
Popshifter.com: One Giant Leap For Fankind
http://popshifter.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Leanne
Certified Fan


Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 59
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two pages mostly condemning the BBC for banning a song, when no such thing happened. BBC LDN is only one of 40 regional radio stations in the UK, and this decision, which seems to have come from bad prep by the producer, was a local issue. As far as I am aware, there is no longer a mechanism within the BBC to ban ANYTHING on a national level, and such decisions are made my individual producers. I had already heard this song on national BBC radio and television, and far from being squares, we find this song title to be a bit of fun. Neither are we likely to feel 'traumatised' by the sight of a woman's breast at a football match.
_________________
Luke for pope ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sparksswede
Sparks Guru


Joined: 12 Nov 2005
Posts: 2119
Location: Umeå,Sweden

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GREAT! and I never thought englishmen or women in general are so prude anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kimonomyhause
Junior Groupie


Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leanne wrote:
Neither are we likely to feel 'traumatised' by the sight of a woman's breast at a football match.


speak for yourself.
_________________
Everybody's favourite 42 year old single woman from Hull!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raoul
Sparks Guru


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 2603
Location: Ophemert

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Never thought BBC would fall back this far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MR JONES
Sparkologist


Joined: 27 Jun 2004
Posts: 623
Location: LOOKING FOR MY WALLET

PostPosted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remind me...in which year did Sparks buy the BBC, and in which year did Leanne become it's legal guardian?
_________________
Half of what I say is utter rubbish and half of what I say is twaddle. The other half just might be serious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leanne
Certified Fan


Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 59
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MR JONES wrote:
Remind me...in which year did Sparks buy the BBC, and in which year did Leanne become it's legal guardian?
Do you have a problem with me expressing my opinion? Or are you just rude to everyone?
_________________
Luke for pope ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Alex Robertson
Sparks Guru


Joined: 11 Jan 2002
Posts: 41283
Location: Crawley,West Sussex

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think,you being such a hot-shot media student and a prominent poster on Chris Moyles' webpage,should re-read all the posts and you'll find that Mr.Jones' "rudeness" is actually tongue in cheek,whereas the posts he was replying to actually initiated any percieved rudeness.
Take it in the spirit in which it was intended...by god you should see some of the things Mr. J has said about me over the years...and if I ever take it personally...
...well he'd better look out...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Leanne
Certified Fan


Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 59
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chris Moyles? I don't even listen to Chris Moyles. And I certainly DON'T post on his webpage. Nor have I ever visited it. Nor have I even mentioned Chris Moyles in this forum, or any other. Nor did I ever describe myself as a hot-shot media student. What are you talking about?

So, where is the rudeness in my post? It was a perfectly polite post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Alex Robertson
Sparks Guru


Joined: 11 Jan 2002
Posts: 41283
Location: Crawley,West Sussex

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My mistake...an attempt at humour obviously off the mark...I mentioned Chris Moyles as I assumed he was funnier than Mark and Lard...the "hot-shot" comment was entirely unforgiveable as a cheap shot,for which I apologise without reserve!!!
I should've researched further prior to posting...What indeed am I talking about????




Leanne wrote:
I'm on a few games forums and media forums (I'm a media student). I've been a member of the Sinatra forum since March 2003, and made about 3000 posts in there, but I don't seem to go there much lately. I spoke to Nancy lots. She's cool. I'm in the Mark and Lard forum, and featured prominently on their very last Radio 1 webpage of all time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Leanne
Certified Fan


Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 59
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Alex. Thanks for your reply. I do accept you didn't mean any offence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Alex Robertson
Sparks Guru


Joined: 11 Jan 2002
Posts: 41283
Location: Crawley,West Sussex

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leanne wrote:
What are you talking about?
So, where is the rudeness in my post? It was a perfectly polite post.
Well it might not be "rude"...but it's not conducive to the exchanging of mundane pleasantries
Leanne wrote:
Does this site have anything to do with Sparks? Is the site authorised by Sparks? because from what I've seen up to now, I'm rather going off the idea of taking an interest in a band that seems paranoid about people actually making a choice as to whether they listen to a song, or in the case of individual radio producers, whether they should be allowed to make a judgment on a song's suitability. This is a most undignified display, and one I do NOT wish to be a part of.

Yet here we are having constructive dialogue...the backbone of civilised society.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SPARKS Forum Index -> Official Announcements All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group